• Home
  • About Matt House And James, Fink & House, P.A.

WEALTH WARS: Arkansas Estate, Trust & Probate Litigation Blog

Commentary And Analysis From A Little Rock, Arkansas Lawyer About Estate And Trust Conflicts, Inheritance Battles, Will Contests, Accounting Actions, Claims By Or Against Fiduciaries, Interpretation Of Wills And Trusts, Fights About Estate Or Trust Expenditures And Money Management, Disputes Over Missing Assets And Property Ownership, Accusations Of Self-Dealing Or Bad Investments, Family Business Litigation And "Corporate Divorces," Claims Of Fraud And Undue Influence, Abuse Of Elders And Questions Of Competency, & Rights Of Beneficiaries And Creditors

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Arkansas Court Of Appeals Affirms Trial Court’s Ruling In Will Contest

December 12, 2009 by Matt House

Earlier this month the Arkansas Court of Appeals ruled in an appeal from the Crawford County Circuit Court that the trial judge did not err in denying a motion to dismiss and finding that the statutory formalities for execution of a will had been satisfied.  Specifically, in Baxter v. Peters, No. CA 09-594, a dispute arose between the executor of the grandmother’s estate and the grandchildren.  The grandmother apparently left nominal gifts of money to the grandchildren and the bulk of her estate to the National Cemetery in Fort Smith, Arkansas.  Presumably the grandchildren were hoping for a larger inheritance if the will in question was not deemed to be valid, and in any event a will contest followed.

 

At trial the probate court heard conflicting testimony on the issue of whether the will was witnessed with the appropriate number of witnesses (the parties did appear to stipulate that the will in question was in fact signed by the grandmother).  Questions had been raised since the attorney who prepared the will had apparently been in the habit of sometimes not calling in all of the witnesses when the will was being signed (the attorney’s own son, for example, evidently testified that he practiced law with his father for a few years and that occasionally witnesses would sign wills outside the presence of the testator).  Ultimately however, the trial court concluded that the signing of the will had been proven according to the stautory formalities. 

 

While the case is not groundbreaking in the sense that it creates a new rule of law, it is nevertheless instructive because it serves as a careful reminder that testators and their attorneys should be extra careful to ensure that all of the prerequisites for signing a will have been followed (e.g., the will should be in writing, actually signed in front of witnesses, and witnesses should also sign in front of the testator and at their request, etc.).  The fact is that circumstances surrounding the signing of wills and trusts can often be suspect, and those who get sloppy about complying with the statutory requirements are proceeding at their peril as—many years later—estate, trust and probate litigation can ensue long after their deaths. 

 

Matt House can be contacted by telephone at 501-372-6555, by e-mail at mhouse@jamesandhouse.com, by facsimile at 501-372-6333, or by regular mail at James, Fink & House, P.A., Post Office Box 3585, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203.


Posted in Recent Arkansas appeals, Will contests | Tagged appeal, Arkansas Supreme Court, Crawford County, will contest | Leave a Comment

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Archives

    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
  • Categories

    • ***WELCOME TO THIS BLOG
    • Accounting actions
    • Breach of fiduciary duties
    • Duties of executors
    • Duties of trustees
    • In the news
    • Interpretation of wills/trusts
    • Misappropriation of assets
    • Powers of attorney
    • Recent Arkansas appeals
    • Rights of beneficiaries
    • Rights of creditors
    • Self-dealing
    • Statute of limitations
    • Will contests
  • Blogs Like This One

    • Arizona Probate Litigation Blog
    • Florida Probate Litigation Blog I
    • Florida Probate Litigation Blog II
    • Florida Probate Litigation Blog III
    • Michigan Probate Law Blog
    • New York Estate And Trust Litigation Blog
    • New York Probate Litigation Blog
    • Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation Blog
    • Texas Probate Litigation Blog
    • Virginia Will, Trust And Estate Litigation Blog
    • Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog
  • Legal Links

    • American Bar Association
    • Arkansas Appeals Blog
    • Arkansas Bar Association
    • Arkansas Business Litigation Blog
    • Arkansas Federal Court
    • Arkansas Search & Seizure Blog
    • Arkansas State Courts
    • Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association
    • Eighth Circuit Court Of Appeals
    • James, Fink & House, P.A.
    • Pulaski County Bar Association
    • Pulaski County Circuit Clerk
    • UALR School Of Law
    • Wall Street Journal Law Blog
  • Non-Legal Sites Of Interest

    • Arkansas Business Journal
    • Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Newspaper
    • Arkansas Entertainment Blog
    • Arkansas Food Blog
    • Arkansas Razorbacks
    • Arkansas State Parks
    • Arkansas Studies Institute
    • Arkansas Times Blog
    • Arkansas Travel Blog
    • Blake Rutherford's Blog
    • Butler Center For Arkansas Studies
    • Clinton School Of Public Service
    • Clinton School Speaker Series
    • Encyclopedia Of Arkansas History & Culture
    • Harmony Health Clinic
    • Hendrix College
    • John Brummett's Blog
    • Oxford American Magazine
    • Wall Street Journal
    • RSS - Posts
    • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Mistylook by Sadish.